Olsen v. Ohio Edison Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under the FMLA, an employee must demonstrate that “ ‘a health provider’ made a professional assessment of his [or her] condition and determined, based on that assessment, that an extended absence from work was necessary”
• “Indeed, it is only where an incapacity is shown that the Court need proceed to a consideration of whether the employee received ‘continuing treatment’ within the meaning of the [FMLA]”
• arthritis and backaches generally not covered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).