· 11/24/1999
Austin v. Haaker
Citations
- 76 F. Supp. 2d 1213
- 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2057
- 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1554
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19148
- 1999 WL 1144792
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a health care provider must determine that an employee required an extended medical leave
- noting the limited instances when the FMLA applies and defining a “serious health condition”
- retaliation claim under § 1981
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: VanBEBBER
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.