Skip to main content
· 11/24/1999

Austin v. Haaker

Citations

  • 76 F. Supp. 2d 1213
  • 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2057
  • 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1554
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19148
  • 1999 WL 1144792

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a health care provider must determine that an employee required an extended medical leave
  • noting the limited instances when the FMLA applies and defining a “serious health condition”
  • retaliation claim under § 1981

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: VanBEBBER

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.