Skip to main content

Olsen v. Deschutes County

Citations

  • 127 P.3d 655
  • 204 Or. App. 7
  • 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing burden on the employer to plead and prove exclusivity bar when raised as an affirmative defense
  • “Applying the maxim necessarily renders one of the two statutes — the older and more general— meaningless, and should therefore be used only when a conflict actually exists and cannot be avoided.”
  • section 876 knowledge requirement for aider-and-abettor liabil- ity “applies whether or not [the underlying tortfeasor] knows his act is tortious” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Wollheim, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.