Granewich v. Harding

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 876(b) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1979) defines a cognizable claim under Oregon law
• holding that section 876(b) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1979) defines a cognizable claim under Oregon law
• observing that each of the three theories in section 876 “already is reflected in existing Oregon case law governing the liability of persons acting in concert” and adopting that section “breaks no new ground”
• explaining that Oregon negligence law is consistent with section 876 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1979), which provides that persons acting in concert may be liable for one another's torts if they \give substantial assistance or encouragement to the other\
• knowingly providing substantial assistance in the commission of a fiduciary breach contravenes Oregon common law
• holding “conspiracy’ is not, standing alone, a tort”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).