Krushwitz v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “arising out of’ and “in the course of’ requirements of the statute are two parts, or “prongs,” of a single, unitary, test
• considering that issue as a defense to a wrongful death claim
• rejecting dismissal or abatement of wrongful death action to allow parties to resort to workers’ compensation system because “such a result would serve no constructive purpose”
• describing the two-part “work-connection” test to determine whether a physical injury is compensable
• court refuses to dismiss tort action based on allegedly work-related injury because doing so \would serve no constructive purpose\
• court refuses to dismiss tort action based on allegedly work-related injury because doing so “would serve no constructive purpose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).