Ninth Circuit· 5/17/2013
Olivas-Motta v. Holder
Citations
- 746 F.3d 907
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 26128
- 2013 WL 8180377
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Silva-Trevino “erroneous[ly] . . . allows an IJ not only to consider the crimes of which an alien has been convicted, but also to consider crimes he may have committed but of which he was not convicted”
- limiting an Immigration Judge “to the record of conviction in determining whether an alien has been ‘convicted of’ a [crime involving moral turpitude]”
- “The Attorney General is mistaken in his conclusion that ‘moral turpitude’ is not ‘an element’ of a CIMT.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fletcher, Hug, Kleinfeld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Weingarten v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2017-07-27· cited 60×
- Edgar Leal v. Eric Holder, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2014-11-06· cited 34×
- SILVA-TREVINOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2015-07-01· cited 30×
- Manuel Olivas-Motta v. Matthew WhitakerNinth Circuit· 2018-12-19· cited 27×
- Fredy Sanchez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2014-07-09· cited 26×
- Maria Arias v. Loretta E. LynchSeventh Circuit· 2016-08-24· cited 23×
- Gabriel Almanza-Arenas v. Eric Holder, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2014-11-10· cited 11×
- Adrian Vargas Cervantes v. Eric Holder, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2014-11-19· cited 9×
- Hernan Hernandez-Zavala v. Loretta LynchFourth Circuit· 2015-11-20· cited 7×
- HERNANDEZBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2014-07-01· cited 5×
- State v. Fernando Ortiz-MondragonWisconsin Supreme Court· 2015-07-09
- JIMENEZ-CEDILLOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2020-07-01
- SILVA-TREVINOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2016-07-01
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 8,453×
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 5,461×
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-03-07· cited 4,574×
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-04-18· cited 1,145×
- Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court· 2009-06-15· cited 738×
- Carachuri-Rosendo v. HolderSupreme Court· 2010-06-14· cited 443×
- Marmolejo-Campos v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2009-03-04· cited 280×
- Naji Antoine Tokatly v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-06-10· cited 201×
- Ali v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2011-03-18· cited 169×
- SILVA-TREVINOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2015-07-01· cited 139×
- Jean-Louis v. Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2009-10-06· cited 124×
- SHORTBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1989-07-01· cited 90×
- Lakhwinder Latter-Singh v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2012-02-17· cited 70×
- Ali v. MukaseySeventh Circuit· 2008-04-04· cited 70×
- Ricardo Prudencio v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2012-01-30· cited 51×
- Fajardo v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2011-10-12· cited 46×
- Bobadilla v. HolderEighth Circuit· 2012-05-29· cited 40×
- Mata-Guerrero v. HolderSeventh Circuit· 2010-11-24· cited 37×
- LEALBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2012-07-01· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.