SILVA-TREVINO
Syllabus
SILVA-TREVINO, 26 I&N 826 (BIA 2016) (1) The categorical and modified categorical approaches provide the proper framework for determining whether a conviction is for a crime involving moral turpitude. (2) Unless the controlling case law of the governing Federal court of appeals expressly dictates otherwise, the realistic probability test, which focuses on the minimum conduct that has a realistic probability of being prosecuted under the statute of conviction, should be applied in determining whether an offense is a categorical crime involving moral turpitude. (3) Under the \minimum reading\ approach applied by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the respondent's conviction for indecency with a child under section 21.11(a)(1) of the Texas Penal Code is not for a categorical crime involving moral turpitude. (4) An alien who has engaged in misconduct involving sexual abuse of a minor is not required to make a heightened evidentiary showing of hardship or other factors to establish that an application for relief warrants a favorable exercise of discretion.
Cites
51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 5,461×
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-03-07· cited 4,574×
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-06-20· cited 2,997×
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2016-06-23· cited 2,769×
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court· 2013-04-23· cited 1,263×
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court· 2007-01-17· cited 1,029×
- BURBANOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1994-07-01· cited 746×
- Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court· 2009-06-15· cited 738×
- MARINBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1978-07-01· cited 360×
- Mellouli v. LynchSupreme Court· 2015-06-01· cited 301×
- United States v. Darrel Duane GriselNinth Circuit· 2007-06-05· cited 249×
- SILVA-TREVINOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2015-07-01· cited 139×
- Jean-Louis v. Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2009-10-06· cited 124×
- C-V-TBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1998-07-01· cited 117×
- SHORTBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1989-07-01· cited 90×
- JEANBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2002-07-01· cited 73×
- ARAIBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1970-07-01· cited 68×
- Quintero-Salazar v. KeislerNinth Circuit· 2007-10-09· cited 65×
- THOMASBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1995-07-01· cited 63×
- Emmanuel Mahn v. United States Attorney GeneralThird Circuit· 2014-09-17· cited 58×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.