Ogden v. Premier Properties, USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the order incorporated earlier-approved use and development commitments but not stating that they included subsequent “covenants”
• noting that “covenants” filed by proposed land developer in that case expressly stated that they ran in favor of all owners of real estate within a one-mile radius of the subject property
• noting covenant is only enforceable by the designated beneficiaries of the restrictions
• “a covenant does not become law and is only enforceable by the designated beneficiaries of the restrictions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).