Scott v. City of Seymour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding city presented insufficient evidence of board action to be entitled to discretionary function immunity
• determining that an expert witness’ affidavit should have been considered because the affiant established an adequate factual foundation
• determining that an expert witness' affidavit should have been considered because the affiant established an adequate factual foundation
• to the extent expert’s statement was conclusory, “any lack of detail in the affidavit goes to the weight and credibility of the affidavit and not to whether it is adequate to create a genuine issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).