Indiana Court of Appeals· 4/17/1972
Suess v. Vogelgesang
Citations
- 281 N.E.2d 536
- 151 Ind. App. 631
- 1972 Ind. App. LEXIS 862
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that hardship exists when “the property for which variance is sought cannot reasonably be put to conforming use.”
- holding that because zoning regulations and restrictive covenants operate independently of each other, a petitioner who is otherwise entitled to a variance should not be denied a variance \merely because utilization of the grant may be in violation of private restrictive covenants\
- zoning variance was not invalid because it conflicted with existing restrictive covenant, but variance did not relieve real estate from covenant
- finding same where property at issue was zoned residential but “nearly impossible” to sell as it had been on the market unsuccessfully for a long time
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- BELVOIR FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. INC. v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-02· cited 71×
- Terpstra v. Farmers and Merchants BankIndiana Court of Appeals· 1985-09-30· cited 58×
- Gordon E. Gouveia, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Kathleen Sue Hiles v. Barbara TazbirSeventh Circuit· 1994-09-29· cited 55×
- Pulos v. JamesIndiana Supreme Court· 1973-10-30· cited 29×
- Bob Layne Contractor, Inc. v. BuennagelIndiana Court of Appeals· 1973-10-04· cited 25×
- Smith v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals· 1974-05-30· cited 24×
- Sills v. Walworth County Land Management CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2002-04-03· cited 24×
- In Re the Marriage of FordIndiana Court of Appeals· 1984-11-07· cited 22×
- Maxey v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals· 1985-07-24· cited 19×
- Randolph v. WolffIndiana Court of Appeals· 1978-04-05· cited 17×
- Fail v. LaPorte Cty. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals· 1976-10-14· cited 16×
- Abney v. AbneyIndiana Court of Appeals· 1978-03-27· cited 15×
- Ogden v. Premier Properties, USA, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-09-20· cited 12×
- Martel v. City of VancouverCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-07-05· cited 11×
- Singleterry v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1981-04-03· cited 11×
- Trimble v. TrimbleIndiana Court of Appeals· 1976-01-12· cited 10×
- Bowman v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals· 1975-07-31· cited 8×
- Thomas B.H. v. Marion County Department of Public WelfareIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-04-14· cited 8×
- Rural Acceptance Corporation v. PierceIndiana Court of Appeals· 1973-07-25· cited 7×
- Highland Springs South Homeowners Ass'n v. ReinstatlerIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-06-16· cited 5×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Michener AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-06-27· cited 97×
- City of East Chicago v. Sinclair Refining Co.Indiana Supreme Court· 1953-03-27· cited 72×
- Metro. Board of Zoning Appeals v. Standard Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals· 1969-09-30· cited 41×
- Lorland Civic Ass'n v. DiMATTEO.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1968-03-25· cited 30×
- Nelson v. THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ETC.Indiana Supreme Court· 1959-11-25· cited 25×
- Kessler-Allisonville Civic League, Inc. v. Marion County Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals· 1965-07-19· cited 23×
- Whiting v. SeaveySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1963-02-15· cited 18×
- Board of Zoning Appeals, Etc. v. WaskeloIndiana Supreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 14×
- Devon Civic League, Inc. v. Marion County Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals· 1967-03-15· cited 11×
- Capp v. LINDENBERG, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court· 1961-12-08· cited 9×
- Bd. of Zon. Ap. of City of Indpls. v. FilisIndiana Court of Appeals· 1965-05-05· cited 7×
- R. J. Realty, Inc. v. KeithIndiana Court of Appeals· 1969-09-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.