· 4/15/1991
Odyniec v. Schneider
Citations
- 588 A.2d 786
- 322 Md. 520
- 1991 Md. LEXIS 81
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Maryland courts will not extend absolute witness immunity unless balancing of competing interests compels immunity award
- applying absolute privilege to health claims arbitration because society’s interest in unfettered speech during proceeding outweighed interest of individual potentially defamed
- noting the vital public function of “the arbitration machinery established by the legislature for health care malpractice claims” encouraged the extension of privilege to the witnesses before arbitration panels
- privilege applied to statements made by doctor when examining patient while preparing to serve as witness in arbitration of medical malpractice claim
- statements of expert witness in health claims arbitration proceeding absolutely privileged because proceeding was equivalent of a judicial proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.