Skip to main content
· 4/15/1991

Odyniec v. Schneider

Citations

  • 588 A.2d 786
  • 322 Md. 520
  • 1991 Md. LEXIS 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Maryland courts will not extend absolute witness immunity unless balancing of competing interests compels immunity award
  • applying absolute privilege to health claims arbitration because society’s interest in unfettered speech during proceeding outweighed interest of individual potentially defamed
  • noting the vital public function of “the arbitration machinery established by the legislature for health care malpractice claims” encouraged the extension of privilege to the witnesses before arbitration panels
  • privilege applied to statements made by doctor when examining patient while preparing to serve as witness in arbitration of medical malpractice claim
  • statements of expert witness in health claims arbitration proceeding absolutely privileged because proceeding was equivalent of a judicial proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.