Gersh v. Ambrose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the two factors balance the public’s interest in full disclosure with the “harm of subjecting the individual to possible legal injury without remedy”
• finding that appearance before a city human relations commission was not analogous to judicial proceedings
• stating that under both the American and the English versions of the absolute litigation privilege, the privilege is not “defeasible by malice.”
• stating that under both the American and the English versions of the absolute litigation privilege, the privilege is not “defeasible by malice.”
• observing that the absolute litigation privilege exists not “merely to protect [a litigation participant] from ultimate liability, but [also] to protect him from the annoyance of suit itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).