Skip to main content
· 9/30/1999

Holt v. Camus

Citations

  • 128 F. Supp. 2d 812
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22601
  • 1999 WL 33229624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion to dismiss in part where the context of the alleged defamatory remarks from an attorney to a judge was unclear
  • “Under the first prong of a false light claim, a plaintiff must show that the offending statements have been communicated to the public at large or to so many persons that the matter must be regarded as substantially certain to become one of public knowledge.”
  • “Under the first prong of a false light claim, a plaintiff must show that the offending statements have been communicated to the public at large or to so many persons that the matter must be regarded as substantially certain to become one of public knowledge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Messitte

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.