Skip to main content

Hall v. State

Citations

  • 411 S.E.2d 777
  • 201 Ga. App. 626
  • 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • both cases distinguished on basis that there was no attempt made to elicit direct expert opinion on ultimate issue of whether victims were raped or molested
  • “The‘typical’behavior of sexually abused children is not within the ken of the average juror and is, therefore, a proper matter for expert testimony.”
  • “The ‘typical’ behavior of sexually abused children is not within the ken of the average juror and is, therefore, a proper matter for expert testimony.”
  • “The ‘typical’ behavior of sexually abused children is not within the ken of the average juror and is, therefore, a proper matter for expert testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley, Beasley, Shulman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.