Odell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Wisconsin statute providing that one is guilty of disorderly conduct if “[wjith intent to annoy another, [he] makes a telephone call, whether or not a conversation ensues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sorenson
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1988-03-22· cited 118×
• People v. McReavy
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1990-09-19· cited 69×
• Mary Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Department of Probation and Attorney General of the State of Connecticut
  Second Circuit· 1980-12-01· cited 66×
• Mary Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Department of Adult Probation
  Supreme Court· 1980-12-01· cited 38×
• Donley v. City of Mountain Brook
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-05-18· cited 21×
• Ross Thill v. Reed Richardson
  Seventh Circuit· 2021-05-03· cited 16×
• State v. Robinson
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1987-07-14· cited 9×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• Doyle v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
• Michigan v. Mosley
  Supreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
• Rudolph v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-06-14· cited 37×
• State v. Johnson
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1973-10-02· cited 31×
• Odell v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-01-30· cited 3×