Skip to main content
· 10/6/2005

Oceana, Inc. v. Evans

Citations

  • 389 F. Supp. 2d 4
  • 35 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20207
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22557
  • 2005 WL 2462273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting inclusion of areas where loggerheads are affected by 17 any source of mortality
  • “Rule 59 was not 13 intended to allow a second bite at the apple.”
  • Rule 59(e) is “not intended to allow a second bite at the apple”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.