In Re Consolidated Salmonid Cases

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing how the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment “included ... thousands of pages of supporting declarations and exhibits”
• posing the following questions: ‘What effect do these exotics have on the Listed Species? To what extent does the contribution of the Projects to the continued presence of these exotics contribute to the jeopardy finding?”
• “Plaintiffs do not directly contest the conclusion that the altered hydrologic conditions are favorable for invasive species. Nor do Plaintiffs challenge the BiOp’s conclusion that CVP and SWP operations contribute to this ecosystem alteration.”
• Hilborn Reply Deck, ECF No. 493
• Cavallo Deck, ECF No. 446-1
• Dotan Decl., ECF No. 442

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).