Court of Claims· 1/18/1990
Ocean Technology, Inc. v. United States
Citations
- 19 Cl. Ct. 288
- 36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,783
- 1990 U.S. Claims LEXIS 12
- 1990 WL 3212
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing recovery under an implied-in-fact contract after determining that a contract was awarded without valid competition
- focusing not on fact that the modification at issue was bilateral, but on the fact that it was not part of, nor intended to implement, the original contract, and thus was a new contract
- “Performance having been fully completed, holding the obligation to pay unenforceable is not a position favored in this circuit.”
- “Performance having been fully completed, holding the obligation to pay unenforceable is not a position favored in this circuit.”
- “if the option never constitutes the chief object of desire for which the contract was negotiated, the option is not a second contract”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nettesheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Global Environmental Solutions Business Division v. United States, Defendant-CrossFederal Circuit· 1999-05-28· cited 143×
- American Telephone and Telegraph Company v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1997-09-24· cited 26×
- Janowsky v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1991-08-06· cited 16×
- Eastern Trans-Waste of Maryland, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1992-11-24· cited 15×
- Unified Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1991-12-02· cited 11×
- PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1998-06-24· cited 10×
- Seven Resorts, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2013-09-16· cited 9×
- Dms Imaging, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2015-10-27· cited 8×
- International Business Investments, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1990-07-25· cited 7×
- Janowsky v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1996-07-03· cited 6×
- CPT Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1992-03-13· cited 6×
- Godley v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1992-08-14· cited 6×
- Cole County Regional Sewer District v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1991-02-07· cited 5×
- Storage Technology Corp. v. CCL Service Corp.D. Maryland· 2000-04-18· cited 2×
- Bay County, Florida v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2014-06-12· cited 2×
- Telex Communications, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1998-04-16· cited 2×
- Micalizzi v. RumsfeldD. Vermont· 2003-01-02
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 1,826×
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 871×
- United States v. ShimerSupreme Court· 1961-06-12· cited 530×
- United States v. N. Y. Rayon Importing Co.Supreme Court· 1947-02-03· cited 247×
- The United States v. Amdahl CorporationFederal Circuit· 1986-03-06· cited 131×
- Urban Data Systems, Inc. v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1983-02-04· cited 91×
- Prestex Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1963-07-12· cited 89×
- Herbert Schoenbrod, as Trustee, Etc. v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1969-05-16· cited 41×
- Gloria Money v. Office of Personnel Management, and Betty J. Money, IntervenorFederal Circuit· 1987-02-11· cited 33×
- John M. Jackson v. United States Postal ServiceFifth Circuit· 1986-10-14· cited 32×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1982-01-27· cited 25×
- Ralden Partnership v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1989-12-14· cited 11×
- C.M.P., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1985-09-26· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.