C.M.P., Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the exercise of an option in an existing contract is not equivalent to the award of a new and different contract; it is an element in the continuation of a unitary contract package”
• “The options are essential parts of the total contractual relationship and are in no sense severable from the initial term as far as the obligations of the parties are concerned____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Global Environmental Solutions Business Division v. United States, Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1999-05-28· cited 143×
• Ocean Technology, Inc. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1990-01-18· cited 20×
• Seven Resorts, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2013-09-16· cited 9×
• Vhc Inc. (Formerly Known as Varo Inc.) v. F. Whitten Peters, Acting Secretary of the Air Force
  Federal Circuit· 1999-06-10· cited 8×
• Telex Communications, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1998-04-16· cited 2×
• Micalizzi v. Rumsfeld
  D. Vermont· 2003-01-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 1977-07-05· cited 870×
• Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power Commission
  D.C. Circuit· 1958-08-29· cited 538×
• United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-Appellants
  Federal Circuit· 1983-03-23· cited 363×
• Dean Forwarding Co. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1983-06-01· cited 15×