Prestex Inc. v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that a contractor may recover under an implied-in-fact contract that has been fully performed even if the contract was “not properly advertised”
• where plaintiff’s bid, in response to an advertised procurement, was deemed nonresponsive because it deviated from the advertised specifications
• “[D]evia-tions may be waived by the contracting officer provided they do not go to the substance of the bid or work an injustice to other bidders.”
• Prestex was the case the government in its motion for summary judgment most relied on for the proposition that a supplier must comply with all material specifications

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).