· 3/25/1981
Occhiuto v. Occhiuto
Citations
- 625 P.2d 568
- 97 Nev. 143
- 1981 Nev. LEXIS 449
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that generally a court should not take judicial notice of records in a different case
- recognizing general rule but holding that the close relationship between the case and a previous divorce proceeding justified the district court taking judicial notice of the prior proceeding
- recognizing general rule but holding that the close relationship between the case and a previous divorce proceeding justified the district court taking judicial notice of the prior proceeding
- explaining that judicial notice may be appropriate when there is a close relationship between the underlying case and the proceeding that is the subject of the judicial notice
- explaining that judicial notice may be appropriate when there is a close relationship between the underlying case and the proceeding that is the subject of the judicial notice
- noting that the district court may take judicial notice of closely related proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Batjer, Gunderson, Manoukian, Mowbray, Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.