Skip to main content
· 3/25/1981

Occhiuto v. Occhiuto

Citations

  • 625 P.2d 568
  • 97 Nev. 143
  • 1981 Nev. LEXIS 449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that generally a court should not take judicial notice of records in a different case
  • recognizing general rule but holding that the close relationship between the case and a previous divorce proceeding justified the district court taking judicial notice of the prior proceeding
  • recognizing general rule but holding that the close relationship between the case and a previous divorce proceeding justified the district court taking judicial notice of the prior proceeding
  • explaining that judicial notice may be appropriate when there is a close relationship between the underlying case and the proceeding that is the subject of the judicial notice
  • explaining that judicial notice may be appropriate when there is a close relationship between the underlying case and the proceeding that is the subject of the judicial notice
  • noting that the district court may take judicial notice of closely related proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Batjer, Gunderson, Manoukian, Mowbray, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.