Supreme Court· 10/29/1974
O'Bryan v. Chandler
Citations
- 419 U.S. 986
- 95 S. Ct. 245
- 42 L. Ed. 2d 194
- 1974 U.S. LEXIS 3130
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that in applying comparative factors, “[rjeasonable expectation, not advance demonstration, is a basis for merit to be accorded relevant factors”
- Commission must give weight to minority ownership and participation in comparative-application proceeding as a portent of increased diversity of program content
- “there is a right to assert a colorable defense of official immunity in a federal forum”
- Commission must give weight to minority ownership and participation in comparative-application proceeding as a portent of increased diversity of program content
- noting Avco was rightly decided
- noting Avco was rightly decided
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Consideration, Took
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- S.W.S. Erectors, Inc. v. Infax, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1996-01-17· cited 488×
- Browning v. NavarroFifth Circuit· 1984-10-01· cited 232×
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-12-01· cited 84×
- Jerome Thomas Lamprecht v. Federal Communications Commission, Barbara Driscoll Marmet and Dragon Communications, Inc., IntervenorsD.C. Circuit· 1992-02-19· cited 80×
- Leroy Garrett, Trading as Garrett Broadcasting Service (Weup) v. Federal Communications CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1975-06-02· cited 59×
- City of Wahpeton v. Drake-Henne, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1975-04-02· cited 50×
- Central Florida Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Cowles Broadcasting, Inc., IntervenorD.C. Circuit· 1979-05-17· cited 43×
- Holmes v. ScullyE.D. New York· 1989-02-15· cited 42×
- Fidelity Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Rko General, Inc., IntervenorD.C. Circuit· 1975-06-30· cited 33×
- Shurberg Broadcasting of Hartford, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Astroline Communications Co., IntervenorD.C. Circuit· 1989-06-16· cited 33×
- All Seasons Water Users Ass'n v. Northern Improvement Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-01-06· cited 23×
- Johansen v. Employee Benefit Claims, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1987-08-27· cited 22×
- Stone v. WilliamsM.D. Alabama· 1992-02-24· cited 22×
- Miller v. Stauffer Chemical Co.D. Kansas· 1981-11-24· cited 20×
- Morsani v. Major League BaseballM.D. Florida· 1999-12-13· cited 20×
- One Sylvan Road North Associates v. Lark International, Ltd.D. Connecticut· 1995-06-22· cited 19×
- James U. Steele v. Federal Communications Commission, Dale Bell, IntervenorD.C. Circuit· 1985-10-31· cited 17×
- National Citizens Committee for Broadcasting v. Federal Communications CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1977-03-01· cited 13×
- Feller v. National EnquirerN.D. Ohio· 1983-01-19· cited 12×
- Growth Realty Companies v. Burnac Mortgage Investors, Ltd.D. Puerto Rico· 1979-08-21· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.