One Sylvan Road North Associates v. Lark International, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a second removal is appropriate if “subsequent pleadings or events reveal a new and different ground for removal.”
• explaining that defendants “have the burden of establishing federal jurisdiction” over a successive removal
• “It is axiomatic that remanding a case to state court terminates the jurisdiction of a federal district court over that case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).