Oakley v. Wianecki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \unsubstantiated inferences and feelings\ are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment
• \[U]nsubstantiated inferences and feelings\ are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Eduardo Cortez v. Joseph G. Gindhart, Esquire D/B/A Joseph G. Gindhart & Associates and Joseph G. Gindhart & Associates
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2014-05-21· cited 115×
• Petersen v. TOWNSHIP OF RARITAN
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2011-02-09· cited 40×
• Nuness v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 2018-06-29· cited 24×
• Flizack v. Good News Home for Women, Inc.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-12-26· cited 11×
• Prado v. State
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-03-31· cited 3×
• Prado v. State
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-10-17· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-10-24· cited 3,095×
• Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-14· cited 506×
• Taylor v. Metzger
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-02-18· cited 268×
• Erickson v. Marsh & McLennan Co.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-02-05· cited 234×
• Montells v. Haynes
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-27· cited 206×