District Court of Appeal of Florida· 11/22/2011
Goings v. State
Citations
- 76 So. 3d 975
- 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18590
- 2011 WL 5842805
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “the state had the burden to show an inability to locate the defendant after diligent search or the defendant’s absence from the state”
- “By not raising the point in his initial brief, Mr. Goings waived the argument that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss merely because the prosecution remained pending more than three years beyond the four-year primary limitations period.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benton, Hawkes, Rowe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tillery v. Florida Department of Juvenile JusticeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-01-04· cited 16×
- Caldwell v. Florida Department of Elder AffairsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-04-22· cited 12×
- State of Florida, Department of Revenue v. Channon C. Price and John E. PriceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-12-30· cited 4×
- Norton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-09-04· cited 2×
- State of West Virginia v. Terry ButcherWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2020-12-07
- DEWAYNE FLOWERS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-02-02
- Daphne Campbell v. Florida Commission on EthicsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-11-20
- Kaiser v. Citizens Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-11-19
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.