Norton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the imposition of more lenient consecutive sentences following the reversal of concurrent sentences does not violate Pearce
• holding that the imposition of more lenient consecutive sentences following the reversal of concurrent sentences does not violate Pearce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Buchanan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-02· cited 11×
• Sands v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-15· cited 10×
• Everett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-16· cited 8×
• Migdal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-05· cited 5×
• Finethy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-01· cited 4×
• Netherly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-16· cited 3×
• Pennington v. State.‎(143)‎
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2017-11-02· cited 1×
• Flewellen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-09-27· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• Robert Eugene Kennedy v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1964-04-01· cited 82×
• George Edward Duggins v. United States
  Sixth Circuit· 1957-01-21· cited 74×
• Blackshear v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-29· cited 40×
• Fasenmyer v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-09-13· cited 39×
• Herring v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-30· cited 34×
• Pahud v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-04-25· cited 17×
• Williamson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-14· cited 9×
• Bruno v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-08· cited 4×
• McMullen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-26· cited 3×
• Norton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-20· cited 1×