Migdal v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding discrepancies between written sentences and oral pronouncement to be scrivener’s errors
• characterizing “a mistake in the written sentence that is at variance with the oral pronouncement of sentence or the record” as a “clerical or ministerial error[] in a criminal case” (quoting Ashley v. State, 850 So. 2d 1265, 1268 n.3 (Fla. 2003))
• considering double jeopardy claim in Rule 3.800 motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• JOSEPH E. BLAIR v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-03-02
• Willie E. Walker v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-09-06
• Chancery Sturrup v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-06-25

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• Ashley v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-01-09· cited 189×
• Troupe v. Rowe
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-05· cited 123×
• Yisrael v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-16· cited 72×
• Drumwright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-17· cited 33×
• Flowers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-20· cited 27×
• Evans v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-19· cited 18×
• Comtois v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-07· cited 11×
• Norton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-07· cited 9×
• Drayton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-18· cited 6×
• Ashley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-28· cited 5×
• Grage v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-13· cited 2×