Buchanan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A trial court can legally restructure a defendant’s sentences by changing concurrent terms to consecutive terms, as long as the new sentence is not found to be vindictive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Richardson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-19· cited 11×
• Sands v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-15· cited 10×
• James v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-24· cited 8×
• Martinez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-12· cited 8×
• Kenny v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-07· cited 6×
• Reynolds v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-19· cited 6×
• Godwin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-12· cited 2×
• Tellier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-12
• Long v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-27
• Tackett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-14
• Hunt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-08

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Herring v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-30· cited 34×
• Norton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-07· cited 9×