Norman Katz v. Herbert Feinberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the arbitrators had exceeded their authority by reaching an issue that the agreement exclusively committed to independent accountants, not the arbitrators
• noting that court had previously held that “a broadly worded arbitration clause committing resolution of all disputes to arbitration satisfied this ‘clear and unmistakable’ standard”
• panel award calculating certain share prices vacated because underlying contract committed this valuation duty to company accountants and explicitly stated that the accountants’ determination would “not be subject to any . . . arbitration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).