Westerbeke Corporation v. Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Court would confirm the arbitration award even if the Court had “serious reservations about the soundness of the arbitrator’s reading” of a contractual provision
• “An arbitrator’s factual findings are generally not open to judicial challenge, and we accept the facts as the arbitrator found them.”
• “The arbitrator’s factual findings . . . are not subject to judicial challenge, particularly on our limited review of whether the arbitrator manifestly disregarded the law.”
• “As a general matter, if the cases that establish a particular legal principle are factually distinguishable in a material respect from the case at bar, then that principle is not ‘well-defined, explicit, and clearly applicable.’”
• findings of fact are the province of arbitrator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).