Alaska Supreme Court· 11/15/1991
Norken Corp. v. McGahan
Citations
- 823 P.2d 622
- 117 Oil & Gas Rep. 407
- 1991 Alas. LEXIS 131
- 1991 WL 238685
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding case for determination of whether necessity element for easement implied by prior use met at the time of severance
- noting that ways of necessity are also called easements by necessity
- court should resort to rules of construction only after failing to ascertain intent from deed and surrounding circumstances
- “[T]he mineral estate is the dominant estate, carrying with it the right to make such use of the, surface as is reasonably necessary to remove the minerals”
- “Courts . . . are virtually unanimous in holding that gravel is not a ‘mineral’ in the legal sense of that word.”
- “Courts . . . are virtually unanimous in holding that gravel is not a ‘mineral’ in the legal sense of that word.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.