Skip to main content

Norken Corp. v. McGahan

Citations

  • 823 P.2d 622
  • 117 Oil & Gas Rep. 407
  • 1991 Alas. LEXIS 131
  • 1991 WL 238685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding case for determination of whether necessity element for easement implied by prior use met at the time of severance
  • noting that ways of necessity are also called easements by necessity
  • court should resort to rules of construction only after failing to ascertain intent from deed and surrounding circumstances
  • “[T]he mineral estate is the dominant estate, carrying with it the right to make such use of the, surface as is reasonably necessary to remove the minerals”
  • “Courts . . . are virtually unanimous in holding that gravel is not a ‘mineral’ in the legal sense of that word.”
  • “Courts . . . are virtually unanimous in holding that gravel is not a ‘mineral’ in the legal sense of that word.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.