Demoski v. New

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that superior court did not err by concluding that implied easement existed where road was reasonably necessary to enjoyment of homestead
• concluding that superior court did not err in reducing attorney's fees where attorneys had overcharged their clients, duplicated work, and \generated ... unnecessary work by making vituperative attacks on opposing counsel\
• affirming a reduction in fees where the trial court found that an attorney had overcharged, that billings were duplicative, that much of the fees related to a claim against another party, and that counsel's failure to follow the civil rules generated excessive costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).