Lake & Peninsula Borough Assembly v. Oberlatz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying clear error standard of review to superior court’s factual findings following trial de novo under Alaska Appellate Rule 609(b)
• instructing courts to consider whether voter’s statement of intent was supported by “sufficient indicia of residency,” or contradicted by objective “indicia of fraud or unreasonableness or implausibility”
• applying claim-by-claim analysis to determine which claims were constitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).