Skip to main content
· 5/8/1981

Nord v. Herreid

Citations

  • 305 N.W.2d 337
  • 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • on motion for summary judgment, district court does not decide fact issues; its sole function is to determine if fact issues exist
  • factual inferences must be resolved against the party moving for summary judgment
  • on summary judgment, the district court is not to decide factual issues
  • “All doubts and factual inferences must be resolved against the moving party.”
  • allowing admission of parol evidence to clarify ambiguous term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.