· 5/8/1981
Nord v. Herreid
Citations
- 305 N.W.2d 337
- 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1283
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- on motion for summary judgment, district court does not decide fact issues; its sole function is to determine if fact issues exist
- factual inferences must be resolved against the party moving for summary judgment
- on summary judgment, the district court is not to decide factual issues
- “All doubts and factual inferences must be resolved against the moving party.”
- allowing admission of parol evidence to clarify ambiguous term
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.