DLH, Inc. v. Russ

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the federal rules are instructive on interpreting the Minnesota rules, especially when “the relevant' language of the state and federal rules is identical”
• stating that summary judgment is appropriate when a rational trier of fact could not find for the nonmoving party
• noting that summary judgment is “inappropriate when reasonable persons might draw different conclusions from the evidence presented”
• stating that it is not sufficient for the nonmoving party to rely on “evidence which merely creates a metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue”
• stating that “the party resisting summary judgment must do more than rest on mere averments”
• stating that the district court \must not weigh the evidence on a motion for summary judgment\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).