J.E.B. v. Danks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding there was evidence of “personal spite” and exaggerated language in the child abuse report that supported a finding of actual malice
• noting that a reporter is acting in good faith even if the reporter exercises bad judgment
• concluding there was evidence of “personal spite” and exaggerated language in the child abuse report that supported a finding of actual malice
• providing that the party asserting immunity bears the burden of “establish[ing] all of the requisite facts” entitling the party to immunity
• reiterating the holding in Bol that the reporting statute did not grant immunity to reporters “who disclose potentially defamatory information to third parties”
• discussing immunity under Minn. Stat. § 626.556, subd. 4, for good faith reports of child abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).