· 7/30/1991
Lee v. Fontine
Citations
- 594 A.2d 724
- 406 Pa. Super. 487
- 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2176
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- any judicially determined preconditions may amplify, but do not alter, the best interest standard
- The Gruber holding does “not create a new standard and we hasten to stress the polestar of our analysis ... remains the best interests of the child.”
- “While we acknowledge the refinements posited in Gruber in relocation cases, they do not create a new standard and we hasten to stress the polestar of our analysis in this case, just as it was in Gruber .. .remains the best interests of the child....”
- “While we acknowledge the refinements posited in Gruber in relocation cases, they do not create a new standard and we hasten to stress the polestar of our analysis in this case, just as it was in Gruber and a legion of prior custody cases, remains the best interests of the child____”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Olszewski, Tamilia and Ford Elliott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.