Skip to main content
· 7/30/1991

Lee v. Fontine

Citations

  • 594 A.2d 724
  • 406 Pa. Super. 487
  • 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • any judicially determined preconditions may amplify, but do not alter, the best interest standard
  • The Gruber holding does “not create a new standard and we hasten to stress the polestar of our analysis ... remains the best interests of the child.”
  • “While we acknowledge the refinements posited in Gruber in relocation cases, they do not create a new standard and we hasten to stress the polestar of our analysis in this case, just as it was in Gruber .. .remains the best interests of the child....”
  • “While we acknowledge the refinements posited in Gruber in relocation cases, they do not create a new standard and we hasten to stress the polestar of our analysis in this case, just as it was in Gruber and a legion of prior custody cases, remains the best interests of the child____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Tamilia and Ford Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.