Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/14/1984
Haag v. Haag
Citations
- 485 A.2d 1189
- 336 Pa. Super. 491
- 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 7264
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]his rule must yield to the paramount principle that the best interests of each individual child must be the determining factor in custody decisions.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wickersham, Johnson, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- M.J.M. v. M.L.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-03-01· cited 449×
- Cardamone v. ElshoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-24· cited 59×
- Nomland v. NomlandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-12· cited 35×
- Michael T.L v. Marilyn J.L.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-04-27· cited 27×
- Bresnock v. BresnockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-20· cited 22×
- Mahoney v. MahoneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-17· cited 16×
- Boylan v. BoylanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-18· cited 12×
- Hathaway v. BergheimSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-07-02· cited 10×
- Karis v. KarisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-06-09· cited 4×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-28· cited 140×
- Com. Ex Rel. Myers v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-07-06· cited 95×
- In Re DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-19· cited 75×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Jordan v. JordanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-07-30· cited 61×
- In Re Donna W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-10· cited 59×
- Garrity v. GarritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-27· cited 55×
- Trefsgar v. TrefsgarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-11-03· cited 42×
- In Re Custody of TemosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-10· cited 39×
- McGowan v. McGowanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 38×
- Commonwealth ex rel. E. H. T. v. R. E. T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-04-03· cited 38×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Newcomer v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-06-25· cited 37×
- Brooks v. BrooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-16· cited 35×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Oxenreider v. OxenreiderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-08-14· cited 30×
- Robert H. H. v. May L. H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-02-26· cited 29×
- Hartman v. HartmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-05-04· cited 26×
- Haraschak v. HaraschakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-20· cited 26×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Lee v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 26×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Grimes v. GrimesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-10-03· cited 25×
- McCourt v. MeyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-18· cited 22×
- Russo AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-28· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.