Nolan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s claim of counsel’s failure to object to prosecutorial misconduct constituted facially sufficient claim in spite of the fact that the challenged conduct was raised as a matter of fundamental error on direct appeal
• rejecting claim that “the trial court erred at the first sentencing hearing by allowing a stand-in public defender” where the defendant “[did] not explain how his stand-in public defender provided any deficient representation that prejudiced [the defendant]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• IRVING FLORES v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-03-02

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Castor v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-12-19· cited 419×
• Freeman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-08· cited 331×
• Gaskin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-01· cited 105×
• Roberts v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-09-06· cited 88×
• Patton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-28· cited 59×
• State v. Anton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-01· cited 13×
• Washington v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-12· cited 11×
• Henderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-10· cited 10×
• Perry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-07· cited 9×