Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/12/1952
Nolan v. Daley
Citations
- 73 S.E.2d 449
- 222 S.C. 407
- 1952 S.C. LEXIS 48
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the Act confers tort immunity not only on the employer but also on any negligent co- employees
- explaining the Act confers tort immunity not only on the employer but also on any negligent co- employees
- “those conducting his business” includes any person who is performing any work incident to the employer’s business
- \those conducting his business\ includes any person who is performing any work incident to the employer's business
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Stukes, Fisi-Iburne, Taylor, Oxner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-07· cited 81×
- Young v. WarrSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-01-22· cited 80×
- Dickert v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-04-07· cited 43×
- Osteen v. Greenville County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-10-26· cited 28×
- White v. PonozzoIdaho Supreme Court· 1955-12-13· cited 28×
- Brown v. Arrington Const. Co.Idaho Supreme Court· 1953-10-30· cited 20×
- Parker v. Williams and Madjanik, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-05-20· cited 20×
- Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-09-22· cited 19×
- Neese v. Michelin Tire Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-14· cited 18×
- Price v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa· 1966-11-15· cited 17×
- Powers v. PowersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-01-08· cited 16×
- Hockett v. ChapmanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1961-11-27· cited 15×
- Tatum v. Medical University of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-20· cited 15×
- King v. Daniel International CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-10-06· cited 15×
- Bell v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1959-07-07· cited 14×
- Cloughley v. Orange Transportation Co.Idaho Supreme Court· 1958-07-02· cited 13×
- Flemon v. Dickert-Keowee, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-08-03· cited 12×
- Boone v. Huntington & Guerry Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-05-03· cited 11×
- Daniels v. RoumillatSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-06-04· cited 10×
- Merritt Ex Rel. Estate of Merritt v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-08-30· cited 9×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Feitig v. ChalkleySupreme Court of Virginia· 1946-04-22· cited 141×
- Peet v. MillsWashington Supreme Court· 1913-11-28· cited 86×
- Bresnahan v. BarreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1934-06-04· cited 51×
- Murphy v. MiettinenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1945-02-05· cited 51×
- Kowcun v. BybeeOregon Supreme Court· 1947-09-30· cited 49×
- Hotel Equipment Co. v. LiddellCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1924-08-13· cited 45×
- Rehn v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court· 1949-04-14· cited 42×
- Stacy v. GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1952-05-12· cited 37×
- Nolde Bros. v. ChalkleySupreme Court of Virginia· 1945-11-19· cited 34×
- Caira v. CairaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1937-01-25· cited 26×
- Cunningham v. MetzgerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1930-05-13· cited 14×
- Pantolo v. LaneNew York Supreme Court· 1945-07-03· cited 12×
- Behan v. MaleadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1937-01-21· cited 10×
- Schwartz v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co.New York Supreme Court· 1940-09-17· cited 10×
- Hade v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1916-04-20· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.