Skip to main content
· 1/22/1969

Young v. Warr

Citations

  • 165 S.E.2d 797
  • 252 S.C. 179
  • 1969 S.C. LEXIS 226

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • tortfeasor has no right to any mitigation of damages because of payments or compensation received by the injured person from a source wholly independent of the wrongdoer
  • tortfeasor has no right to any mitigation of damages because of payments or compensation received by the injured person from a source wholly independent of the wrongdoer
  • “The general test applied is ... whether there exists the right and authority to control and direct the particular work or undertaking, as to the manner or means of its accomplishment.”
  • “a judgment will not be reversed because of repetition in a charge to the jury unless such [repetition] is prejudicial and it reasonably appears that the jury was mislead thereby”
  • “The general test applied is ... whether there exists the right and authority to control and direct the particular work or undertaking, as to the manner or means of its accomplishment.”
  • “Under the ‘collateral source rule’ a tort feasor has no right to any mitigation of damages because of payments or compensation received by the injured person from an independent source.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moss, Lewis, Bussey, Brailsford, Littlejohn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.