· 10/6/1982
King v. Daniel International Corporation
Citations
- 296 S.E.2d 335
- 278 S.C. 350
- 1982 S.C. LEXIS 435
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a party to be an independent contractor solely because the contract designated it as such
- Schlopy’s exceptions 26, 29; Berkeley/Horwitz’ exceptions 4,5
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwell, Lewis, Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.