Skip to main content
· 10/6/1982

King v. Daniel International Corporation

Citations

  • 296 S.E.2d 335
  • 278 S.C. 350
  • 1982 S.C. LEXIS 435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a party to be an independent contractor solely because the contract designated it as such
  • Schlopy’s exceptions 26, 29; Berkeley/Horwitz’ exceptions 4,5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harwell, Lewis, Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.