Luciano v. Diercks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that even where a district court fails to make specific findings of fact in support of its determination, this court may infer findings that the record clearly supports
• “[Tjhis court will imply findings of fact and conclusions of law so long as the record is clear and will support the judgment.”
• this court may imply factual findings so long as they are clear from the record
• \[T]his court will imply findings of fact and conclusions of law so long as the record is clear and will support the judgment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Certified Fire Protection, Inc. v. Precision Construction, Inc.
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2012-08-09· cited 159×
• Sly v. Sly
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 10×
• Commercial Cabinet Co. v. Mort Wallin of Lake Tahoe, Inc.
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1987-05-29· cited 9×
• Matos v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1994-07-26· cited 2×
• Mason-McDuffie Real Estate v. Villa Fiore
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2014-10-02
• Premier One Holdings, Inc. Vs. Newmyer
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2021-09-24

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Noble v. Noble
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1970-06-10· cited 21×
• Pease v. Taylor
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1970-03-25· cited 19×
• Gorden v. Gorden
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1977-09-19· cited 12×
• Griffin v. Westergard
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1980-07-29· cited 4×
• Luciano v. Marshall
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1979-04-11· cited 1×