District of Columbia· 1/31/1975
Nixon v. Sampson
Citations
- 389 F. Supp. 107
- 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14045
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t is the incumbent President, not the former President, who bears the legal and political responsibility for either asserting or waiving the privilege.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Charles R. Richey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court· 1977-06-28· cited 1,340×
- Richard Nixon v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1992-11-17· cited 182×
- In Re Franklin National Bank Securities LitigationE.D. New York· 1979-08-03· cited 113×
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesDistrict of Columbia· 1976-04-01· cited 52×
- Richard Nixon v. Honorable Charles R. Richey, United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1975-02-14· cited 51×
- Crawford v. DominicE.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-04-26· cited 37×
- Guy v. Judicial Nominating CommissionSuperior Court of Delaware· 1995-04-07· cited 37×
- McLaughlin v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-11-26· cited 36×
- Freedom Foundation v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court· 2013-10-17· cited 27×
- Public Citizen v. BurkeD.C. Circuit· 1988-04-12· cited 22×
- In Re Sealed Case (Government Records)D.C. Circuit· 1991-11-22· cited 20×
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. SampsonD.C. Circuit· 1978-12-21· cited 13×
- Robert M. Brandon v. Jack M. Eckard, Administrator, General Services AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 1977-12-22· cited 8×
- In re DwyerNew York Supreme Court· 1975-12-15· cited 5×
- Nixon v. SampsonD.C. Circuit· 1978-03-22· cited 4×
- Banzhaf v. SmithDistrict of Columbia· 1984-02-29· cited 3×
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. VanceDistrict of Columbia· 1977-12-08· cited 3×
- Cities Service Helex, Inc.Court of Claims· 1977-05-20· cited 3×
- Wolfe v. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict of Columbia· 1982-05-07· cited 2×
- Unnamed caseD.C. Circuit· 1978-12-21· cited 1×
Cites
72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court· 1962-03-26· cited 6,173×
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 6,135×
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court· 1946-04-01· cited 4,157×
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 4,095×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 3,484×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 3,053×
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court· 1957-06-03· cited 2,816×
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 2,202×
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1973-10-18· cited 1,941×
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,740×
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 1,701×
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court· 1972-06-19· cited 1,683×
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court· 1952-06-02· cited 1,646×
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 1,399×
- Laird v. TatumSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 1,272×
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court· 1921-06-01· cited 1,253×
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 1,251×
Other cases named Nixon v. Sampson
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.