Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 6/14/2019

Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Citations

  • 384 F. Supp. 3d 254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • compelling husband’s claims to arbitration because he “knowingly accepted the benefit of [his wife’s] contractual relationship with Amazon” and so “must also be held to the arbitration clause that governs that relationship.”
  • compelling husband’s claims to arbitration because he “knowingly accepted the benefit of [his wife’s] contractual relationship with Amazon” and so “must also be held to the arbitration clause that governs that relationship”
  • discussing 23 traditional equitable estoppel and “direct benefits estoppel” whereby “a nonsignatory may be 24 compelled to arbitrate where it knowingly accepts the benefits of an agreement with an arbitration 1 clause.” (cleaned up)
  • “Although Section 3 of the FAA only speaks of staying 14 proceedings, it is well-settled than an arbitrable dispute may be dismissed in lieu 15 of a stay if the defendant requests dismissal.”
  • granting motions to compel arbitration and dismiss the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glasser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.