E.D. New York· 6/14/2019
Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Citations
- 384 F. Supp. 3d 254
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- compelling husband’s claims to arbitration because he “knowingly accepted the benefit of [his wife’s] contractual relationship with Amazon” and so “must also be held to the arbitration clause that governs that relationship.”
- compelling husband’s claims to arbitration because he “knowingly accepted the benefit of [his wife’s] contractual relationship with Amazon” and so “must also be held to the arbitration clause that governs that relationship”
- discussing 23 traditional equitable estoppel and “direct benefits estoppel” whereby “a nonsignatory may be 24 compelled to arbitrate where it knowingly accepts the benefits of an agreement with an arbitration 1 clause.” (cleaned up)
- “Although Section 3 of the FAA only speaks of staying 14 proceedings, it is well-settled than an arbitrable dispute may be dismissed in lieu 15 of a stay if the defendant requests dismissal.”
- granting motions to compel arbitration and dismiss the case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Glasser
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bissonnette v. LePage BakeriesSecond Circuit· 2022-05-05· cited 25×
- Richard Daschbach, et al. v. Rocket Mortgage, LLCD. New Hampshire· 2023-03-22· cited 1×
- Pillar Project AG v. Payward Ventures, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2021-05-24
- Bissonnette v. LePage BakeriesSecond Circuit· 2022-09-26
- Abadi v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2024-03-29
Cites
57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 9,657×
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court· 1976-01-14· cited 8,787×
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Second Circuit· 2002-02-21· cited 4,118×
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court· 1989-03-06· cited 2,861×
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 1,187×
- Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.Second Circuit· 2016-08-25· cited 986×
- United States v. Male Juvenile (95-Cr-1074)Second Circuit· 1997-07-28· cited 970×
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court· 2009-05-04· cited 968×
- Thomson-Csf, S.A. v. American Arbitration Association, Evans & Sutherland Computer CorporationSecond Circuit· 1995-08-24· cited 847×
- Mihalik v. Credit Agricole Cheuvreux North America, Inc.Second Circuit· 2013-04-26· cited 827×
- Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Second Circuit· 2017-08-17· cited 511×
- register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.Second Circuit· 2004-01-23· cited 391×
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-06-27· cited 370×
- Nancy Kosakow v. New Rochelle Radiology Associates, P.C.Second Circuit· 2001-12-20· cited 295×
- Bensadoun v. Jobe-RiatSecond Circuit· 2003-01-13· cited 220×
- Mag Portfolio Consult, Gmbh v. Merlin Biomed Group LLC and Merlin Biomed Advisors LLCSecond Circuit· 2001-10-10· cited 209×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,406 R. Stockton Rush, III v. Oppenheimer & Co., and Scott SeskisSecond Circuit· 1985-12-20· cited 200×
- Rochelle Saks v. Franklin Covey Co. And Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc.Second Circuit· 2003-01-15· cited 200×
- Starke v. SquareTrade, Inc.Second Circuit· 2019-01-10· cited 200×
- Kevin Comer v. Micor, Inc. Kenneth C. Smith Elliot H. Wagner Barbara Arbucci, and Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2006-02-01· cited 189×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.