Kevin Comer v. Micor, Inc. Kenneth C. Smith Elliot H. Wagner Barbara Arbucci, and Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that nonsignatories of arbitration agreements may be bound by the agreement under ordinary contract and agency principles
• acknowledging the same but not applying the theory because, unlike here, it was a signatory, and not a nonsignatory, who invoked estoppel
• acknowledging the same but not applying the theory because, unlike here, it was a signatory, and not a nonsignatory, who invoked estoppel
• noting \the general rule that a nonsignatory is not bound by an arbitration clause\
• quotingLetizia v. Prudential Bache Sec., Inc., 802 F.2d 1185, 1187-88 (9th Cir. 1986)
• finding “contract and agency 22 principles continue to bind nonsignatories to arbitration agreements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).