Nancy Kosakow v. New Rochelle Radiology Associates, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant, “due to its failure to post notices required by the FMLA,” could be equitably estopped from challenging plaintiffs eligibility for FMLA leave
• holding that affidavits showing employee's pre- shift showering sufficient to overcome summary judgment as to FMLA eligibility
• holding that determinations of the New York State Division of Human Rights had no preclusive effect on subsequent employment discrimination claims under the ADA
• observing that in such cases the Court of Appeals “did not mention the burden of proof, let alone describe it as a dispositive factor”
• finding that daily periods of fifteen minutes were not properly excluded as de minimis
• concluding that a state agency proceeding did not estop a plaintiff’s claims when the plaintiff “did not receive any type of hearing wherein she could confront the witnesses against her,” “was not entitled to any discovery,” including interviews of witnesses, and did not have counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).