Skip to main content

Nicholas, J. v. Hofmann, D.

Citations

  • 158 A.3d 675
  • 2017 Pa. Super. 77
  • 2017 WL 1102790
  • 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that while Pa.R.C.P. 1148 does not govern affirmative defenses listed as new matter, such defenses must be more than a restatement or continuation of an impermissible counterclaim
  • issue not raised in Statement of Questions Involved is not before us
  • setting forth our standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Ott, Solano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.