· 6/30/2009
Levitt v. Patrick
Citations
- 976 A.2d 581
- 2009 Pa. Super. 117
- 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1772
- 2009 WL 1862499
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, if any claim remains outstanding, then the order is generally not appealable
- stating that appeal properly lies from the entry of judgment, not from the order denying post-trial motions
- stating that an appeal properly lies from the entry of judgment, not from the order denying post-trial motions
- stating that an appeal properly lies from the entry of judgment, not from an order denying post-trial motions
- stating that appeal properly lies from the entry of judgment, not from order denying post-trial motion
- stating that appeal properly lies from the entry of judgment, not from order denying post-trial motions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klein, Popovich, Fitzgerald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.