Skip to main content
· 6/30/2009

Levitt v. Patrick

Citations

  • 976 A.2d 581
  • 2009 Pa. Super. 117
  • 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1772
  • 2009 WL 1862499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, if any claim remains outstanding, then the order is generally not appealable
  • stating that appeal properly lies from the entry of judgment, not from the order denying post-trial motions
  • stating that an appeal properly lies from the entry of judgment, not from the order denying post-trial motions
  • stating that an appeal properly lies from the entry of judgment, not from an order denying post-trial motions
  • stating that appeal properly lies from the entry of judgment, not from order denying post-trial motion
  • stating that appeal properly lies from the entry of judgment, not from order denying post-trial motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein, Popovich, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.