Skip to main content
· 2/16/2006

Krebs v. United Refining Co. of Pennsylvania

Citations

  • 893 A.2d 776
  • 2006 Pa. Super. 31
  • 2006 Pa. Super. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an appellant waives issues that are not raised in both his or her concise statement of errors complained of on appeal and the Statement of Questions Involved in his or her brief on appeal
  • holding that an appellant waives issues that are not raised in both his or her concise statement of errors complained of on appeal and the Statement of Questions Involved in his or her brief on appeal
  • stating that any issue not set forth in or suggested by an appellate brief’s statement of questions involved is deemed waived
  • stating that any issue not set forth in or suggested by an appellate brief’s statement of questions involved and concise statement is deemed waived
  • holding any issue not raised in a Rule 1925(b) statement is deemed waived
  • “[A]ny issue not raised in a statement of matters complained of on appeal is deemed waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Melvin, McCaffery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.